stas27>> Только его разрешение не убито неотключаемым шумодавом (не бери в голову, это я просто так в плане поддержания религиозной войны ).Shurik> Встроеный шумодав обычно работает достаточно мягко, уж разрешение никак он не убивает.Shurik> Ежели же нет - то фтоппку!
ОФФТОП ОН:
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sonydslra700/page32.asp -
My primary gripes were around a couple of questionable decisions; firstly that RAW files already have noise reduction applied to them, this in effect means that the photographer can't treat RAW as the 'digital negative'. This subsequently removes the ability to successfully apply any third party noise reduction method (either now or in the future) or to make his or her own decisions about the balance between noise and NR. I understand that this is because a certain amount of noise reduction occurs very early in the image pipeline (at or around the sensor) but why that can't be simply disabled by choice is a curious to say the least.
The second oddity is the fact that this camera's base sensitivity appears to be ISO 200 (not ISO 100), subtly hinted by the fact that the Auto ISO range begins at 200 and supported by our own dynamic range tests. Sony managed to indicated that ISO sensitivities above 3200 were 'out of calibration' but not those below 200 (the trade-off below this point is highlight dynamic range). This gives rise to the rather ridiculous situation where most users (who try to stick to the lowest ISO wherever possible) will not only be shooting at a setting that doesn't produce the optimum image quality, but also losing a valuable stop of sensitivity at the same time.
With the gripes out of the way I have to say that overall image quality was very good, with the A700 producing as much resolution / detail as the competition at lower sensitivities and noise reduction keeping noise levels in check at higher sensitivities without losing too much detail (although we personally would prefer less luminance reduction and more chroma reduction, which is Nikon's approach). Color was predictable and neutral and tonal response was good without ever being over contrasty (nice roll-off in highlights from ISO 200 upwards).
Ранний неотключаемый шумодав не даёт фотографу выбирать свой личный баланс между шумом и деталями на высоких ИСО (и народ на ДПРевью жаловался, что звёзды убираются вместе с шумом). НО!!!!
Всё равно качество картинки очень хорошее, что и показывает нам т. Джин-Тоник.
P.S. Плюс к этому жалуются, что зря Сони сделала 100ИСО штатным начальным ИСО вместо 200 - у этого сенсора базовая чувствительность 200, на 100 получаются чище тени, но немного режутся светлые места.
ОФФТОП ОФФ.